(Solved) NU525 Unit 3 Assignment: Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper Solution

NU525 Unit 3 Assignment: Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper

Consumer Health Information Website Analysis Paper

  1. Unit 3: Introduction (Required Content) (1 of 4)
  2. Unit 3: Required Resources (2 of 4)
  3. Current Assignment: Unit 3: Assignment – Consumer Health Information Website Analysis Paper (3 of 4)
  4. Unit 3: Discussion – Consumer Website Analysis (4 of 4)

Instructions

The purpose of this assignment is to apply knowledge of reliable and valid information sources to patient education in clinical nursing practice and to evaluate patient educational materials posted on the internet.

The assignment for this week consists of 3-5 page paper evaluating consumer/patient health information on the web. You will be required to find a website that is designed to provide health information to the consumer/patient and analyze it according to the criteria described below. You are required to report your analysis in a formal course paper.

  • Choose a health topic/issue in which you want to educate your patient/consumer/family about (diabetes, heart failure, teenage pregnancy, depression, etc…) and briefly describe in your paper :
    • An explanation of your health topic/issue and why you selected it (Significance of the topic/issue selected).
  • Find an internet source that is designed to provide information/education about your selected health topic/issue and analyze the following:
    • describe the website (main title, information)
    • describe the overall impression about the design of the website (organization, easiness of finding information, easiness to read, table of content/index, colors, font, does it look professional).
    • Who is sponsoring the website? Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper
    • How often is the site updated? When was the site created? Was it updated recently?
    • Does it state that the content is not medical advice?
    • Who is the intended audience? Does the site have a clear target audience? Is the information presented appropriate to the target population?
  • How credible are the information presented: Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper
    • Is there any evidence that the author of the web information has some authority in the field about which she or he is providing information? Who is responsible for the information? What are the author’s credentials? Is a mechanism in place for you to contact the author?
    • Are there clues that the author/s are biased? For example, is he/she selling or promoting a product? Is the author taking a personal stand on a social/political issue or is the author being objective ? Bias is not necessarily “bad,” but the connections should be clear. Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper
    • Does the information have a complete list of works cited, which reference credible, authoritative sources? Is the information valid and supported by evidence? Are omissions noted? Is the author’s point of view objective and unbiased? Get Benchmark – Literature Review Essay Help
    • Is the information accurate? Any inconsistencies, inaccuracies, errors, false information, etc…
    • Are there links that point to additional, valuable resources with minimum effort?
  • Adequacy: Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper
    • Overall, does the site provide consumer/patient education? is the education adequate or does the consumer have to go somewhere else to find answers about the topic?
  • Sophistication of the information:
    • Is this source too elementary, too technical, too advanced, or just right?
    • Is the purpose of the site clearly stated? Does the site match its purpose? Is the site intended to educate or sell? Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper
  • Submit a 3-5 page analysis paper following APA format (include a title page, introduction, headings, Summary paragraph, reference page, and in-text citation). You need to include at least 5 reliable and current (within the last 5 years) references of whichat least 3 journal articles.

NU525 Unit 3 Assignment: Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper

Assignment Resources

Estimated time to complete: 6 hours

Rubric

NU525 Unit 3 Assignment: Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper

NU525 Unit 3 Assignment: Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
40 pts

Level 5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.

35.2 pts

Level 4

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.

32 pts

Level 3

Identifies a focused and manageable/doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.

28.8 pts

Level 2

Identifies a topic that while manageable/doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic. Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper

25.6 pts

Level 1

Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.

0 pts

Level 0

Does not clearly identify a topic that is relative to the assignment.

40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views
40 pts

Level 5

Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

35.2 pts

Level 4

Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

32 pts

Level 3

Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

28.8 pts

Level 2

Relates information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches.

25.6 pts

Level 1

Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.

0 pts

Level 0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.

40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Process
55 pts

Level 5

All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.

49.5 pts

Level 4

Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.

44 pts

Level 3

Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.

38.5 pts

Level 2

Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.

33 pts

Level 1

Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework. Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper

0 pts

Level 0

The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework.

55 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper

75 pts

Level 5

Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

67.5 pts

Level 4

Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

60 pts

Level 3

Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

52.5 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.

45 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
30 pts

Level 5

States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.

Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper

27 pts

Level 4

States a conclusion that is a logical interpretation of the inquiry findings.

24 pts

Level 3

States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings.

21 pts

Level 2

States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.

18 pts

Level 1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings.

0 pts

Level 0

States an illogical conclusion from inquiry findings.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications

Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper

30 pts

Level 5

Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.

27 pts

Level 4

Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.

24 pts

Level 3

Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.

21 pts

Level 2

Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.

18 pts

Level 1

Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.

0 pts

Level 0

Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.

Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
30 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

27 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a strong command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.

24 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

21 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

18 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
30 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

27 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

24 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

21 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

18 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper

0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

30 pts
Total Points: 330 Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper

NU525 Unit 3 Assignment: Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper

Get 30% off your first purchase

X
Click to Order